Eu4 ideal army composition

Part 3 of a 4 part series on basics of combat and combat related mechanics. In this part, we discuss ideal army composition and why use of cavalry should be ...

Eu4 ideal army composition. Tech 7: add at least 1 cannon to the fighting stack, to get +1 at siege. You may additionally make 10/0/10 siege stack, not for fighting and just for fast siege of forts level 1-3, since they are the most common. 10 infantry may be replaced with 10-16 infantry mercenaries. Tech 16 (latest tech 22): delete cavalry and fill your army with combat ...

Go to eu4 r/eu4 • by ... Army Composition . 1500s Ottomans, nearly tech 12, what is a good army comp for a balanced 20-25k stack? Edit: Current composition is 12:4:4 (inf/cav/art) This thread is archived New comments cannot be posted and votes cannot be cast

step4: annex vassal. step5: repeat step 2->4. If you start as a big country in europe (like france) you will get massive coalitions when you take even tiny amounts of land. I'd suggest start small and snowball. or be England and GTFO out of mainland europe, nobody cares if you vassalise scotland and eat ireland.Now, I've never played trade before and never went so late in EU4 - but I'm basically maxed out, swimming in more money and manpower than I can spend, and can do whatever I want (holy shit trade is strong). This got me wondering about cavalry, army composition and the 40 max combat width.Subreddit for the Europa Universalis IV, Crusader Kings 3 and Victoria 3 mod Anbennar and its fantasy setting ... Hey, I'm playing as Esthil and just switched to the Undead Army. I cant really seem to find much on what an ideal composition would be besides a lot of infantry, and I notice that artillery combat ability has a penalty to it ...Go to eu4 r/eu4 • by ... The caveat to army composition is the supply limits of the provinces you're going to be operating in. I think taking attrition unnecessarily is silly, so going under your combat width to get a sane army that fits into your supply limits is fine. ... This is the ideal in the perfect situation, but the problem is that ...The help thread has a list of resources, including one on army composition based on tech level. Levels 1-15: 4 cav and rest of combat width infantry. At Level 7 add 1-10 cannons for siege. Level 16+: add full combat width of cannons. You may do a siege stack 10/0/10 for fast sieges before Level 16.

r/eu4. A place to share content, ask questions and/or talk about the grand strategy game Europa Universalis IV by Paradox Development Studio. MembersOnline. 350K subscribers in the eu4 community. A place to share content, ask questions and/or talk about the grand strategy game Europa Universalis IV by….Make sure to fight on flat ground. Lacking arty was more impactful than fighting on rough terrain though. It really is that important to have arty. Anyone saying that you should run 100% CAV is implying that your frontline should consist only of CAV, backline still requires arty. Little_Elia.Pre mil tech 16 infantry with 4 cavalry per stack. At and after mil tech 16 start adding cannons as your economy can support it. You always want to make sure you have full combat width of infantry so your cannons don't get sent to the front row.Typically I just have one huge army that's 60 thousand strong that stack wipes so the composition I use isn't the best I imagine but it's . 5 heavy inftanty, 1 archer, 1 heavy calv, 1 and light calv are the ratio. 1. Burner_Vampyr. • 10 mo. ago.Dec 3, 2013 · The "ideal" army composition would be something along the lines of 10 infantry/ 6 cavalry / 16 artillery. Anything that goes beyond that is pretty much wasted, but a few extra units in case of losses (or to detach sieges) are okay. Again, any units more rarely ever come to play. Even if there's a huge battle going on it'll rarely ever last long ...

The best is setting yours to 0 and sieging whilst your vassals swarm. I sometimes use about 20% maintenance if I colonize in the early game. But later it is usually enough to raise the maintenance to 100% when the natives rise up. So I have almost 1000 hours and most of that is at either 100% or 0%.Just Google 'eu4 1.33 combat changes' and you'll see a big reddit post about it. Sorry not sure how to share it rn on my phone. Basically the other pips got more relevant, not just moral. Artillery is safer in battle but does retreat too from what I understand so you sometimes have to reinforce with them and not just infantry.The only factor in which specificity of country plays into ideal army composition is cavalry ratio. Vijayanagar is Indian tech group, which has a 50% "max" cavalry ratio, meaning if you have 6 infantry regiments in a stack, any more than 3 cavalry regiments in that same stack will earn you a penalty for being over the max optimal ratio.100% cavalry, only engage on flat terrain. I'm not a Tengri horde. Have around 65% cavalry if 75% is your limit, because if you lose some infantry in battle and therefore get over 75% cav ratio you'll get a malus on them. As said only fight on flat terrain like grassland, steppes, dessert etc for the shock bonus.Army composition is important in EU4. The game takes a lot of things into account when calculating the outcomes of a skirmish and knowing how to optimize your army will give you that edge when it comes to toppling your foes - especially the larger ones. How Army Composition Works. The combat width tooltip in Europa Universalis 4.Cavalry is not useless 😂. I've found that the best army comp for Europeans is a 2:1 ratio infantry to cavalry. As Sweden you should probably have armies of about 15, with 10 infantry and 5 cavalry. Once artillery is introduced, you should aim for a 2:1:1 ratio, so armies of 20 with 10 inf 5 cav and 5 art. It will also be prudent to replace ...

Gun shows nampa.

Heavies only is the ideal naval composition. Naval engagement width has a base of 25. It is not increased by tech, unlike army combat width. It is only increased by a couple of policies you'll never use (because they both require Naval idea group), as well as a context based 10% increase in coastal seas.AI Army Composition. R5: For the love of all that is holy Paradox, please address AI army composition sometime in the near future. This has been a running issue as long as I have been playing this game; if the AI has "too much" money (such as my march Riga here), they will make absolutely ridiculous army compositions to fill out their force ...A well-composed photograph is really a matter of opinion, but there are a few tricks that tend to result in better pictures. That's what we're going to take a look at today. A well...I'm at mil tech 11, combat width 27 and was wondering what the ideal composition was? I read that ideally you want artillery to fill your combat width, and then at least the same amount of infantry (probably a bit more) to make sure your artillery isn't exposed and left to die on the front line.Ideal template is always Inf/Cav to fill your front line and have Art on your back row. In early game Art doesn't do too much damage from back row but mid-late game it just decimates enemy armies. But if you can't fill your front row with inf or cav, art eill be on front row and they take extra damage on front row.

2)+0.2 military tactics is huge, it provides a flat modifier to damage taken so you are taking 13.3% more losses from military tactics alone. 3) You have a -1 to all rolls from a terrain penalty. 4) Your leader is 2/1/2/0, Spains is 6/4/1/1 so they are a net 4/3/-1/1 better.Horde idea, so you can hit 5 ducat cavalries, making your cavalries cheaper and hit harder than your infantries. Then only use cavalries at this point. This allows a much bigger skill cushion for the new horde players, as your armies hit harder causing more stack wipes and fewer casualties, and your economy can easily sustain your troops ...For a better explanation of composition, and even for combat mechanics in general, check out Reman's Paradox War Acadamy on Youtube. Part 1 is the composition IIRC, and part 2 is Mechanics. Part 3 covers idea groups, but it's not as important.Almost always I keep a 3-1-2 composition until mod-game, when I switch to a 5-2-3 composition, then in late-game to a 5-1-3 with bigger overall stacks. Originally posted by Psychotic Fury: Originally posted by ChaosTLW: Max is 90, actually, but eh.scientifically speaking, a 1:1 ratio of artillery and infantry (to the combat width) is the ideal composition after military technology 16. but i always disagreed with that. the attrition makes it all useless, and even one battle will make the front line understrength for months. i recommend a a bit more infantry than artillery, and use shift consolidate to keep the front line strong.40K subscribers. 1.2K. 61K views 4 years ago EU4 Basics. Part 3 of a 4 part series on basics of combat and combat related mechanics. In this part, we discuss ideal …There's more or less no reason to not just use all 1:1 cav/cannon armies unless the 100% ratio thing changes for some reason. The reason is money. Hordes are poor. As much cavalry as possible. Merc infantry to siege/fill out the ranks a bit. No costs for reinforcement means merc infantry is more worthwhile, unfortunately merc cavalry is still ...A 5% discipline advantage turns a loss by 5% into a win by 5% and a 10% discilpine advantage in the same battle goes from 5% loss to 13% winning. The impact of modifiers really drives home what you also mentioned about the tedious micromanagement for army composition when tech changes.This is a bad army composition as all of your cannons will be on the front row, where they take a lot of damage. Personally if I had a 20 stack I'd go for 16 infantry and 4 cavalry, no cannons assuming I'm going up against another similarly sized or larger army. If they were smaller, then cannons could sit safely on the second row.Overall, mercs, supply limit and cannon factor a lot more into army composition and management than the inf/cav split. Don't cheap out on cav, especially early. Do cheap out on cannon, especially early. If you're super dominant and just want to siege a bunch (like russia) then you can go for more cheap infantry. Oh, one more thing.

100% cavalry, only engage on flat terrain. I'm not a Tengri horde. Have around 65% cavalry if 75% is your limit, because if you lose some infantry in battle and therefore get over 75% cav ratio you'll get a malus on them. As said only fight on flat terrain like grassland, steppes, dessert etc for the shock bonus.

A single regiment of a single unit type is a layer of abstraction in EU4, necessary to represent warfare. You having a "1000" of infantry, or "1000" of artillery, doesn't, by any means, mean that this would be an actual army of 1k infantrymen and 1k cannons irl.They are simply too pricy and not worth it, unless the situation is dire in the lategame and you need a 10/4/10 stack to win the war ASAP. If you do that, I suggest you delete everything but infantry once you are done, because again, it is most likely going to be a huge strain on your economy. For army compositions, refer to a spreadsheet ...Your army composition seems mostly good, except in your 32/8/32 example you want 32/8/40. Cavalry can be useful even for nations that don't get buffs. The issue is that for many players of a certain skill level, trying to manage their cavalry along with the rest of the army really isn't worth the micro.Make sure to fight on flat ground. Lacking arty was more impactful than fighting on rough terrain though. It really is that important to have arty. Anyone saying that you should run 100% CAV is implying that your frontline should consist only of CAV, backline still requires arty. Little_Elia.What should Qing army comp be? I just formed Qing in 1590 after conquering fully conquering Ming and claiming the Mandate. My army comp right now is 13/31/20 more or less. It's not very refined but I'm RPing and I thought it would make sense if it wasn't exact as a horde. Anyway, I'm now in chinese tech group and have 50/50 cavalry support ratio.Outshined by other military idea groups. Horde. A must pick for hordes as you will be going ultra blobbing mode and +25% cav combat ability is great as your non-siege armies will be 100% cav if you’re a tengri horde. Other military idea groups don’t compare as you need all your idea groups to accommodate your ultra blobbing playstyle.Thanks for the replies everyone. Can't say I'm certain what composition I'm more comfortable with. I liked the 3/1/2 because of the aforementioned carpet sieging as well as the plentiful number of infantry compared to cavalry; I tend to be quite paranoid about running the risk of having too few infantry to support my cavalry after particularly heavy battles, and I also often like to construct ...The right army composition can be the deciding factor between victory and defeat. Here are some tips on how to create the best army compositions in EU4. The Best Army Composition in EU4. One may say that there is no single best Army Composition formula. As is the case for many strategy games, context may significantly change what …The polish ideas of winged hussars give a whopping 33% combat bonus with cavalry which makes them much better, while swedish and prussian ideas boost infantry by 20% which eveyone seems to be the opinion that that it makes cavalry quickly bad (perhaps two per army or so). #2. Fedaykin Jan 2, 2017 @ 9:36am. Originally posted by Findus:

Pittsburgh craigslist motorcycle.

Samsclub syf com login register.

Europa Universalis IV. Ottomans best army composition. DannyTheBrit. Sep 9, 2023. Jump to latest Follow Reply. Ugh can anyone suggest me a good ottoman late …Go to eu4 r/eu4. r/eu4. A place to share content, ask questions and/or talk about the grand strategy game Europa Universalis IV by Paradox Development Studio. ... What is the best army composition? For the majority of the game, I use two armies of 18/2/20, which before battles, I merge into a single 80k death stack of 36/2/40, in which the 4 ...2)+0.2 military tactics is huge, it provides a flat modifier to damage taken so you are taking 13.3% more losses from military tactics alone. 3) You have a -1 to all rolls from a terrain penalty. 4) Your leader is 2/1/2/0, Spains is 6/4/1/1 so they are a net 4/3/-1/1 better.the army composition depends on your tech level. early on you should go for ~60-70% inf + rest cavalry, as soon as you get cannons add ONE or TWO to the stack. start going towards your compositon after MIL 13 or so. (slowly, no need to reach that army composition before MIL 16 at least)What should Qing army comp be? I just formed Qing in 1590 after conquering fully conquering Ming and claiming the Mandate. My army comp right now is 13/31/20 more or less. It's not very refined but I'm RPing and I thought it would make sense if it wasn't exact as a horde. Anyway, I'm now in chinese tech group and have 50/50 cavalry support ratio.The help thread has a list of resources, including one on army composition based on tech level. Reply. JackNotOLantern. •. Levels 1-15: 4 cav and rest of combat width infantry. At Level 7 add 1-10 cannons for siege. Level 16+: add full combat width of cannons. You may do a siege stack 10/0/10 for fast sieges before Level 16.Use numbers like 24, when you split your army its 5-2-5 which is some nice small regiments. When a huge battle is going combining them would make 20-8-20 which most of the time would be accurate as combat width.5 Badges. May 21, 2011. 166. 0. Jul 25, 2014. Add bookmark. #3. Your optimal composition would be no infantry and cavalry only, as long as you don't have access to superior foreign infantry - but you'll probably struggle to afford that. You don't need infantry to siege.From miltech 13-14 onwards however, you will want, at the very least, more cannons than your opponent. The (summed) +2 and +3 cannon fire damage modifiers are the big ones to watch out for here. Assuming you can afford it, having your front-line equal to your cannon line plus 50% (e.g. 14/4/12 or 12/6/12) is a good guideline to follow. As ...Infantry+cavalry = combat width x 1.5 Artillery = combat width. Your infantry:cavalry ratio might vary by nation, but basically I use Cavalry = Mil Tech / 2. Such that at 16 tech I have 8 cavalry in an attack. And the rest infantry. The new reinforcement rules, change some support tactics, but I just break an army into 3 parts for manuevers to ...Also, cavalry are flat out inferior to infantry at mil6 (unless you have an insane shock general) so at that specific point the ideal army has 0 cavalry (or 2 to flank if enemy army is smaller than combat width). Also, the "ideal" army has full combat-width cannons as soon as they are invented. ….

Army composition? I have been playing for a little while now but recently i did a cusco run and got my balls twisted by the rebels and im wondering if it's because of my army template? I usually have 10/5/0 in the beginning of runs until i unlock artillary and i switch to 15/5/10 and the first idea tree i go for is usually offensive.A single regiment of a single unit type is a layer of abstraction in EU4, necessary to represent warfare. You having a "1000" of infantry, or "1000" of artillery, doesn't, by any means, mean that this would be an actual army of 1k infantrymen and 1k cannons irl.A combat width's worth of artillery, and then the same of infantry with 4-6 cavalry for flanking as well. This is the ideal composition, but in many situations you won't be able to either field this many troops (due to the expensiveness of artillery and its relative weakness earlier in the game) or have a province with a high enough supply limit to park them.Once Artillery becomes available. 1 or 4 artillery for +1/+2 vs forts. Over the course of the 1500s: slowly increase relative artillery amount until the back row is full. Horses only if you happen to have multiple cavalry bonuses and/or special cavalry. Hordes for example, but typically not the random muslim nation with their +15% cav bonus ...The best army composition depends on ideas, groups and WHAT are the stats of your general, because the best army for a 0 fire 6 shock general is TOTALLY different from the best army for a 6 fire 0 shock. With high Shock you want much larger ratio of cavalry. Even more when it´s a specific tech level that gave major bonuses to cavalry.Go to eu4 r/eu4 • by ... Im currently playing as Germany and I just want to know what a good army composition would be. Its late game if anyone has a good composition that pairs well with Prussian ideas please share. Thanks! ... The combat width thing is really the ideal that I try for, but keeping it near that ratio based on supply is ...Army composition meta/recommendations Meta Just finding out (the hard way) about how important army comp is. ... In general it seems like you have the right idea with the comp you are going for. At the start of the game armies will rely more on cav (around 4) because you may not be able to field a full combat width army and in this case ...Hello, i recently started today in EU4, i am from the vic2 community and i want to start in this game, i got all DLCs and i want to ask recommended nations/guides to start in this game. comments sorted by Best Top New Controversial Q&A Add a Comment More posts you may like ... r/eu4 • Ideal army composition in 2023?Late game your army should be combat width of inf and combat width of cannons. Arzibaani. • 2 yr. ago. If you really want to tryhard you should have one or two "cannon stacks" with a full combat width of canons and slightly over the combat width of infantry. (I personally run twice the combat width of inf just to be safe) the rest of your ... Eu4 ideal army composition, [text-1-1], [text-1-1], [text-1-1], [text-1-1], [text-1-1], [text-1-1], [text-1-1], [text-1-1], [text-1-1], [text-1-1], [text-1-1], [text-1-1], [text-1-1], [text-1-1], [text-1-1], [text-1-1], [text-1-1], [text-1-1], [text-1-1], [text-1-1], [text-1-1], [text-1-1], [text-1-1], [text-1-1], [text-1-1], [text-1-1], [text-1-1], [text-1-1], [text-1-1], [text-1-1], [text-1-1], [text-1-1], [text-1-1]